Guarantee the asshole isn't including unions
Maybe not, there you, but any proposed "solution" would include unions, since they mention:
Corporations and unions are protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution because of the ruling in “Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,” which found that a state law prohibiting corporations from making political campaign contributions using their treasury funds was unconstitutional.
That Democratic Representative is saying that a fix to the problem is necessary, and you cannot honestly think that if they included corporations, they wouldn't address unions.
Um no..... Hard to argue against that. Your debate fail is strong.
Please, explain why I'm wrong.
You said that 80% of federal programs and alphabet soup are illegal according to the constitution. Nothing in the constitution states that the govt cannot create programs to regulate media. While we can see obvious accounts of our govt going against the spirit
of the constitution and the freedom
our founding fathers desired for us as they created it, the constitution is taken in a very literal sense.
It's picked apart word for word, and any number of loopholes can be found and utilized to do whatever the govt wants. They are only limited in what the document literally says very clearly can and cannot happen.