We tried to tell you... : Yamaha R1 Forum

Creeping Death · 11-07-2012, 04:51 AM

To the GOP and all Ron Paul haters:

We tried to tell you Rmoney couldn't beat Obama.

You wouldn't listen.

We tried to tell you that no one 'likes' Rmoney and there are not enough 'anyone but Obama' people to win the election.

Again you wouldn't listen.

We tried to tell you that Ron Paul would draw votes from ALL PARTIES AND INDEPENDENTS.

Again you wouldn't listen.

We tried to tell you, you needed our support to win.

You said we were a "non-factor".

We said we would remember in November. We said we would remember the treatment of the Ron Paul delegates and supporters. We said we would remember your blatant disrespect of Dr. Paul

You said we would "fall in line".

You were wrong. Now you have four years to think about your mistakes.

Hindsight's a bitch aint it?

***KMac*** · 11-07-2012, 05:05 AM

As bad as Romney is, your boy PROVED he can't even beat him in the regionals, the states, or the semi's, what gives you the idea that he could win the Nat'l Championship?

Gearheaded · 11-07-2012, 05:25 AM

How ya been frank? Like time no talkey

Creeping Death · 11-07-2012, 05:30 AM

Actually, Ron Paul won 7 states, including the all important Iowa.
Iowa
Maine
Minnesota
Nevada
Louisiana
Washington
Colorado.

Rmoney and the GOP cheated throughout the entire process. At the polls, at the regional conventions and at the national convention. You can't change the rules to shut one team out in the middle of the game and then say they lost.

Video evidence is all over Youtube but you chose to ignore it. Ron Paul couldn't beat Rmoney because the Ron Paul supporters followed the rules. Shame on them for not cheating.

But we could have helped Rmoney win. But we were shit on and laughed at.

z064life · 11-07-2012, 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMac

As bad as Romney is, your boy PROVED he can't even beat him in the regionals, the states, or the semi's, what gives you the idea that he could win the Nat'l Championship?

I'm kinda curious as to why the media didn't cover Ron Paul so I don't think most really knew him.

As to how he was treated, that was wrong and the chances of him pulling off an upset were slim. There was no need for the GOP to treat him the way they did.

-M- · 11-07-2012, 06:05 AM

such a waste of bandwidth

***KMac*** · 11-07-2012, 06:05 AM

Ron Paul was his own biggest obstacle in getting the nomination, not the GOP, nor Romney, nor anybody else.

***Fikays*** · 11-07-2012, 06:13 AM

Doesn't matter now anyways....all you Ron Paul supporters live in the same country we do...what the f*ck is there to gloat about???

***KMac*** · 11-07-2012, 06:16 AM

apparently, they think they've taught somebody a lesson. Not sure who, or what the lesson is, but as long as they think they taught it, I guess that's intrinsically important to them.

Sabian · 11-07-2012, 06:17 AM

z064life · 11-07-2012, 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fikays

Doesn't matter now anyways....all you Ron Paul supporters live in the same country we do...what the f*ck is there to gloat about???

I actually think it was said on the news yesterday.

They tried McCain as a moderate and lost, they tried Romney as a moderate and lost. Maybe they need to try a true conservative.

BTW...I supported Ron Paul, but I still voted yesterday and my state went Romney this year vs Obama in '08

***Fikays*** · 11-07-2012, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMac

apparently, they think they've taught somebody a lesson. Not sure who, or what the lesson is, but as long as they think they taught it, I guess that's intrinsically important to them.

I don't know who either. This is teh exact attitude I have always received from R. Paul supporters....like they know something the rest of us do not. Thinking they can just look down on non-supporters. It is ridiculous, really, cause all they did was help f*ck us all by staging their "protest".

Quote:

Originally Posted by z064life

I actually think it was said on the news yesterday.

They tried McCain as a moderate and lost, they tried Romney as a moderate and lost. Maybe they need to try a true conservative.

BTW...I supported Ron Paul, but I still voted yesterday and my state went Romney this year vs Obama in '08

Agreed.

***KMac*** · 11-07-2012, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by z064life

They tried McCain as a moderate and lost, they tried Romney as a moderate and lost. Maybe they need to try a true conservative.

Paul is a Libertarian.

z064life · 11-07-2012, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMac

Paul is a Libertarian.

I think the lines of a Libertarian and a "conservative" are aweful blurry

It comes down to we need someone that will get our finances in order (Paul). And will put the federal government back to what it was suppose to be and that is LIMITED..again, I believe Paul would have done that.

WarMachine · 11-07-2012, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fikays

I don't know who either. This is teh exact attitude I have always received from R. Paul supporters....like they know something the rest of us do not. Thinking they can just look down on non-supporters. It is ridiculous, really, cause all they did was help f*ck us all by staging their "protest".

Won't deny some supporters are like that but not all, both sides shit on each other and all sides lost.

***KMac*** · 11-07-2012, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by z064life

I think the lines of a Libertarian and a "conservative" are aweful blurry

It comes down to we need someone that will get our finances in order (Paul). And will put the federal government back to what it was suppose to be and that is LIMITED..again, I believe Paul would have done that.

Mitch Daniels is 4X the candidate Ron Paul is. Daniels has done it, Paul has only talked about it.

***Fikays*** · 11-07-2012, 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarMachine

Won't deny some supporters are like that but not all, both sides shit on each other and all sides lost.

Incorrect. One side did not "lose" or don't think they did anyway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMac

Mitch Daniels is 4X the candidate Ron Paul is. Daniels has done it, Paul has only talked about it.

z064life · 11-07-2012, 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMac

Mitch Daniels is 4X the candidate Ron Paul is. Daniels has done it, Paul has only talked about it.

I'd take daniels over all, but he didn't/wouldn't run so that was never an option

***KMac*** · 11-07-2012, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by z064life

I'd take daniels over all, but he didn't/wouldn't run so that was never an option

yet after the convention, Paul was not an option, but apparently a lot of his supporters couldn't let it go.

TheButcher · 11-07-2012, 06:49 AM

47% of America is made up of moochers and complete idiots, those idiots just happen to live in high electoral states. Hence the outcome of the election.