Why are shortie levers better? I've done a search and this question has been asked many times, and everyone just says things like, "no one has ever regretted it." Thing is, most such posts are on the apperance forum. My R1 will primarily be a track bike, so I'm only concerned about function, which is why I didn't post this on that forum. Right now I use 2 fingers on the brake, and all four on the clutch. I'm affraid the shorties won't be comfortable on the clutch hand. So what I wondered was... what do the pros use? I just watched the MotoGP race at Mugello again last night and watched specifically for levers. I think every single rider I saw (and they showed close ups of about 10 different rider's controls) had LONG levers. Why would they have long ones if short ones were all you need/better? Obviously they don't care about loosing a $200 part if they crash, so they're strictly going to use what's best for them, functionally. They usually brake with just two fingers as well, yet they have full length levers. I think Haydn may use shorties, but everyone else I saw were definitely long. So, I'm torn. Everyone seems to say shorties, yet all the pros seem to use long ones, and I wonder why the disconnect. Most reasons for shorties I've seen here only go so far as to say "You won't even notice they're short after 5 minutes." That's not a reason to get them. Why are they BETTER, other than looks? The angle is exactly the same, so the pull won't be any different with a given brand (Pazzo, CRG, etc). Any input? Thanks
David
David