Carmelo is destroying GP now he's got his disgusting mitts on WSBK
Money hungry fvck. He should leave it alone and fire himself at the same time
http://www.crash.net/motogp/news/184606/1/motogp_and_world_superbikes_brought_together.html
This is what you just can't comprehend.....not many can afford "top-flite prototype racing." Hence 3 mfr's only in the series.KMac said:2-strokes are not a new concept either, where are they now? Things change, hopefully in a progressive direction. CRT's are not in keeping with the modern expectations of top-flite prototype racing.
and "We"? Do you work for Dorna and forgot to tell us?
KMac said:What can I say, you never fail to seize the opportunity to show you have a lot of facts and data about <something>, in spite of the fact you don't see the bigger picture. People (especially fans) relate to things they can buy, brand things, like Honda, Ford, Chevy, Kawasaki, Yamaha, etc. It makes ZERO difference if they can buy the actual item, itself. Couple that with the expectation that MotoGp is the pinnacle of motorcycle racing and that's what they expect to see.........the BEST, cutting edge, Unobtainium, etc. CRT doesn't fit EITHER bill. Thank you for supplying your bag of shit.
Regardless if you don't like the CRT's, they were a necessity to boost up the grid. You think anyone likes them? You think Dorna is doing back flips over this? Are you thick or something? The worldwide recession necessitated this, together with the MSMA driving up costs. 12 bikes on the grid is not enough. Every year we've seen a decrease in the number of bikes on that grid so what were they supposed to do? They've only had rule making authority (Dorna) since December of last year. CRT's are permanent, they were a chess move to tell the mfr's that if you keep it up we'll just go production racers only. The CRT formula is only a negotation tactic, and that's it. Go tell the world champ that there isn't an endless supply of money out there any more for this sport. That shit is gone. And don't tell me about sponsors, look at Colin's team. He's got a sponsor and the factory Yamaha team doesn't. What does that tell you? In fact all the CRT's have sponsors. Are they big name? You tell us grand master, but they are sponsors. Without these bikes you hate so much, those sponsors probably wouldn't be there. So with CRT's you've filled the grid up, got more sponsors in the sport, etc. Coke, Monster, or whomever is only going to sponsor a proto-bike because they want to be at the front.KMac said:You apparently have failed to read, and comprehend.........no real surprise. I clearly stated (and have many times int he past) that the run away costs associated with the electronics, etc... needed to be addressed. Pursuing CRT's is admitting that they don't (or can't) stand up to the mfrs and negotiate a solution, so they just decide to add new rules that allow in "cheaper" entries, and then will push to support those new rules while the others are left to die on the vine. This isn't hard, tell Honda to fcvk off instead of indirectly telling all of them to fcvk off with this passive-aggressive approach of jumping in bed with the CRT formula. Get the costs down and Kawi and Suzuki will be back, and it won't be prohibitive for BMW to enter. However, departing from the marketable brands and top level performance and technology for what IS allowed, is a mistake, and it is already costing them. Where's the big sponsors who left GP because of cost? According to the bag of shit you've been feeding out of, they should be all over the CRT bikes. Where are they? The World Champion has said fcvk it, this is stupid.......I'm outta here. Other riders support him, but won't publicly say it or commit to making the same stand. Nobody in those stands are paying to see no-names on CRT's.
LOL, wtf?KMac said:I have a bike that runs perfectly. I then spend $5,000 on a newly developed PowerCommander21, have it installed and now my bike runs intermittently well are requires weekly trips to the dealership for troubleshooting. It doesn't take nostradamus to know that if I remove the PC21 the bike will go back to running perfectly again. However, nostradumass comes along and thinks I need to throw out the PC21 AND the bike, and he's got you goose-stepping right along with him.
I'm damn proud to see things opposite of you. You see everything as black and white, it's this or that, no middle ground of any kind. And maybe that is why you have such a big problem with this and grasping it. CRT's are a direct result of financial issues both in and out of the sport. That is what you and Casey don't get. The money isn't there to field a full grid of prototypes. The mfr's charge too much for the satellite teams to lease a bike from them. If you actually read anything about this sport you'd know that. The team heads have stated that the lease prices are too damn expensive and they were jumping head first to run a CRT bike because it's actually something they can afford to do and can procure sponsorship for. They cannot afford a prototype sat bike nor get a sponsor to pay for it.KMac said:You clearly refuse to get it. Lower the costs to make more mfr's able to enter, and provide more bikes, NOT make a second set of rules to allow pseudo-mfr's to provide a lower, secondary class bike. For somebody who doesn't see everything as black white, you always manage to see just the opposite of whatever color I see, but still try to convince yourself that it's not black and white. For instance, to you it's black and white that CRT's were "necessary". If you want to dumb down a series, then you're probably right
The mfr's don't want to cut costs on electronics, they also don't want to drop the prices on their leased bikes for satellite teams. So in a sense, it was CRT's or just have 12 bikes on the grid, which is not enough. Everyone bitching and moaning like you about this, well fine then. Let's take your model and apply it. Going the way it was going prior to Dorna fighting the mfr's, in a few more years you wouldn't have a series at all. You'd have Honda and Yamaha until Yamaha couldn't afford it any more. Ducati is lucky that Audi bought them or they would have been out, too much debt. That would have left 2 mfr's in this pinnacle series. Maybe you should read up on economics. Dorna didn't want CRT's either, it was just necessary in this economic climate and necessary due to the MSMA jacking shit up to the moon.KMac said:The very definition of racing is contrary to economics, so talk that nonsense somewhere else. If you want to see a dumbed down prototype series, fine.........no problem with that........just make it it's own series and we'll see if it can survive on it's own. MotoGP should remain the upper echelon prototype series that it is, albeit with sensible revisions to the rules to carve out stupidly high costs in areas where engineers are winning races, and not the riders.
Well they don't want the spec ECU and it's taken all of this to let Honda know they will not run the series. Honda is trying to run to WSBK and leave GP due to that spec ECU. This press release was only released to let HRC know that running over there won't do them any good.KMac said:The spec ECU along, along with a couple other fixes are all that's needed. CRT is not it. The fans have said so, and the riders have said so (at least the ones who aren't shilling for their ride).
This is what you just can't comprehend.....not many can afford "top-flite prototype racing." Hence 3 mfr's only in the series.
Quit being an idiot. You mentioned Suter, FTR, etc, and how nobody can purchase those frames. They can, if they want to buy a frame instead of a home. My response to you was that what is in the dealer is a far cry from a MotoGP bike so it doesn't matter one way or the other. You cannot buy a Japanese bike with pneumatic valves, Honda doesn't have a production V4 sportbike currently (although they state one is on the way), Ducati doesn't have a current production V4 either. You also can't buy one with gas charged forks, ceramic rotors, tbt mapping, etc, etc. If a production racer has a Honda/Yamaha/Ducati/BMW motor, slap a mfr. logo across the lowers and there is your significance.
Regardless if you don't like the CRT's, they were a necessity to boost up the grid. You think anyone likes them? You think Dorna is doing back flips over this? Are you thick or something? The worldwide recession necessitated this, together with the MSMA driving up costs. 12 bikes on the grid is not enough. Every year we've seen a decrease in the number of bikes on that grid so what were they supposed to do? They've only had rule making authority (Dorna) since December of last year. CRT's are permanent, they were a chess move to tell the mfr's that if you keep it up we'll just go production racers only. The CRT formula is only a negotation tactic, and that's it. Go tell the world champ that there isn't an endless supply of money out there any more for this sport. That shit is gone. And don't tell me about sponsors, look at Colin's team. He's got a sponsor and the factory Yamaha team doesn't. What does that tell you? In fact all the CRT's have sponsors. Are they big name? You tell us grand master, but they are sponsors. Without these bikes you hate so much, those sponsors probably wouldn't be there. So with CRT's you've filled the grid up, got more sponsors in the sport, etc. Coke, Monster, or whomever is only going to sponsor a proto-bike because they want to be at the front.
And yes people do pay to see Depuniet on a CRT. Go to Lemans and you'll see it. Go to Indy, COTA, or Laguna next year and you'll see Colin Edwards fans there to see him.
LOL, wtf?
I'm damn proud to see things opposite of you. You see everything as black and white, it's this or that, no middle ground of any kind. And maybe that is why you have such a big problem with this and grasping it. CRT's are a direct result of financial issues both in and out of the sport. That is what you and Casey don't get. The money isn't there to field a full grid of prototypes. The mfr's charge too much for the satellite teams to lease a bike from them. If you actually read anything about this sport you'd know that. The team heads have stated that the lease prices are too damn expensive and they were jumping head first to run a CRT bike because it's actually something they can afford to do and can procure sponsorship for. They cannot afford a prototype sat bike nor get a sponsor to pay for it.
The mfr's don't want to cut costs on electronics, they also don't want to drop the prices on their leased bikes for satellite teams. So in a sense, it was CRT's or just have 12 bikes on the grid, which is not enough. Everyone bitching and moaning like you about this, well fine then. Let's take your model and apply it. Going the way it was going prior to Dorna fighting the mfr's, in a few more years you wouldn't have a series at all. You'd have Honda and Yamaha until Yamaha couldn't afford it any more. Ducati is lucky that Audi bought them or they would have been out, too much debt. That would have left 2 mfr's in this pinnacle series. Maybe you should read up on economics. Dorna didn't want CRT's either, it was just necessary in this economic climate and necessary due to the MSMA jacking shit up to the moon.
Well they don't want the spec ECU and it's taken all of this to let Honda know they will not run the series. Honda is trying to run to WSBK and leave GP due to that spec ECU. This press release was only released to let HRC know that running over there won't do them any good.
And try to keep in mind, I know it's hard for you, that these CRT bikes are at the beginning of their development. Emmett made a point recently at one of the tracks. The CRT's were 3 seconds away from the factories a lap. Honda's budget for the season, $50 million. The CRT, $500k. Those 3 seconds are worth 49.5 million dollars to Honda.