has anyone put a 200 on the rear if they fit? what tire brand and name of tire would you recommend for a a style of wheelies and corners? i dont do much drag.
:iamwithststreetjester said:180 more traction in the corners. Do to taller side walls. 190 wider foot patach. 200 waste of rubber. Only good for drag.
:iamwithstFOZZ said:streetjester - dont doubt the Fozzinator - Im never wrong...
JK - Might be ???
I do love the 180 on the One - cheaper too...
I thought you were never wrong?FOZZ said:The 180 without a doubt turnes in way quicker but is more likely to wash out than a 190 in heavy turning due to less surface area on the road..
:iamwithstSoCalR1Rider said:I thought you were never wrong?
The 190/50 has a larger contact patch when stood up, but because of its sharper profile, the 180/55 has greater contact area at full lean.
If you are doing more commuting than canyon carving the 190/50 is your best bet. If you spend motr time leaned over, then go with the 180/55.
R1tacosauce said:man, we need the tire expert or some info from computer professor.:crash I've researched this sh*t all over, and no one ever freakin agrees about the contact patch and lean contact, and blah blah blah. where is the freakin expert around here so he can make a freakin sticky about this topic?:2bitchsla
I don't want to call myself an "expert", but I've been racing for a long time and I have done a lot of work with the R1. I currently run on 16.5" 205's which is the same rubber that is on AMA superbikes. They are great tires, but for an average bike and rider they would definitely suck. The are designed to handle SB power output, not street riding. A 200+ tire on the street is a bad choice unless you're a drag racer and running it nearly flat. You need to balance the turn rate of the tire with it's overall grip characteristics... with the R1 that's a 180-190 tire. Bigger isn't always better with rear tires.R1tacosauce said:man, we need the tire expert or some info from computer professor.:crash I've researched this sh*t all over, and no one ever freakin agrees about the contact patch and lean contact, and blah blah blah. where is the freakin expert around here so he can make a freakin sticky about this topic?:2bitchsla
OMFG!!!!!Wheatman said:Thats just Sick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
190/55 gives you both!SoCalR1Rider said:I thought you were never wrong?
The 190/50 has a larger contact patch when stood up, but because of its sharper profile, the 180/55 has greater contact area at full lean.
If you are doing more commuting than canyon carving the 190/50 is your best bet. If you spend motr time leaned over, then go with the 180/55.
Problem there is the R1 uses a 6" rim, not a 5.5".SoCalR1Rider said:Why don't we solve this once and for all. If someone with a 190/50 rear and someone with a 180/55 rear in lets say pilot power each go out and cut a piece of paper to match the profile of the rear tire crown when mounted on the 5.5 rim. Then scan these in and we will overlay them on top of eachother. But sure to include a scale like a 1" mark on the paper.
This will only work if both people have the same brand and model tire and they are not excessively worn.
Any volunteers?
I would do it myself, but I run Supercorsas.