MCNThe 2004 model is the first R1 to boast a ram-air system that forces cold air into the engine. The all-new engine produces a claimed 172bhp which is raised even further to 180bhp at higher speeds when the ram-air has full effect. And with a weight of just 172kg the Yamaha is the first bike to boast a power to weight ratio of greater than 1bhp/kg.
MCNThe 2004 model is the first R1 to boast a ram-air system that forces cold air into the engine. The all-new engine produces a claimed 172bhp which is raised even further to 180bhp at higher speeds when the ram-air has full effect. And with a weight of just 172kg the Yamaha is the first bike to boast a power to weight ratio of greater than 1bhp/kg.
Randall said:Dude, remember the 1999 Yamaha R6 press releases? Everyone was blowin' sea-monkeys in their drawers over claims of 120 bhp from a 600 cc engine. When put to the dynos, the thing barely spat out 95 bhp at the rear wheel. Given a similar fudge-factor, I say we're looking at 148, or so, at the rear wheel. I'll be plenty surprised if the thing breaks 150.
Yeah thats if you add in the ram air...Petrol_spice said:Give it 180 @ the crank, take 20% off that for the lag and other bullsh!t taking power away like, gearbox,chain, rear wheel, barrings etc, etc and your still looking at something that's 150-160ish and that friends is WSB power figures on the street, that mixed with the styling and I don't need another bike, ever.
Are you kidding me? Come on. Plus, they almost never have facility to take the ram-air effect into account when they dyno motorcycles in Cycle World, Sport Rider and Motorcyclist. The thing will be lucky to piddle out a buck fifty or so. Nothing to shit your pants over. It's the Kawi that I'm worried about. If anyone's ambushing, it's the boys in green.R-Uno said:You are all correct about manufacturer numbers. Yamaha has under-rated this motor by 5-10hp. This was done for the competition.
It's NOT at the crank!! BHP means at the wheel!! Ya know...Brake Horsey PowerPetrol_spice said:Give it 180 @ the crank, take 20% off that for the lag and other bullsh!t taking power away like, gearbox,chain, rear wheel, barrings etc, etc and your still looking at something that's 150-160ish and that friends is WSB power figures on the street, that mixed with the styling and I don't need another bike, ever.
I did as soon as I read the quote I put in the first post. Even provided the link to you doubters...:fingersick-one said:Give your head a shake! 180 hp is at the crank, I will bet my soon to be 04 R1 on that. Later...
BHP is brake horse power at the engine or the rear wheel as I understand it. It depends whether you measure it on an engine dyno or a chassis dyno. The 180 claimed is measured on an engine dyno. RWHP is rear wheel horsepower which is less. BHP can be the same as RWHP if they are both measured on a chassis dyno taken from the rear wheel.BladeR1 said:It's NOT at the crank!! BHP means at the wheel!! Ya know...Brake Horsey Power![]()
It'll take years for Geeeeeeeee1K to play catch up!!! :finger
I know that. I was just saying you can measure brake HP at the engine as on an engine dyno or at the rear wheel as on a chassis dyno.AreOne said:"Brake" horsepower isn't where you measure it (crankshaft, rear wheel) it's how you measure it. The term brake is used because they actually use a brake to absorb the power. Most dynos are either a water brake or an electric brake.
Besides, Yamaha is going to give you the most impressive sounding (highest) number which is always crankshaft.
I just hope it's more than the other bikes...
Oh, well in that case, I completely agree!Kirk said:I know that. I was just saying you can measure brake HP at the engine as on an engine dyno or at the rear wheel as on a chassis dyno.
Where did you learn this?BladeR1 said:It's NOT at the crank!! BHP means at the wheel!!
If that's the case IT IS BULLSHIT!BladeR1 said:It's NOT at the crank!! BHP means at the wheel!! Ya know...Brake Horsey Power![]()
It'll take years for Geeeeeeeee1K to play catch up!!! :finger